Week 8: Final Blog Assignment

Time Difference: Because we were asked to connect with professional international time zone was an issue.  The various hours affected the ability to communicate properly.

Importance: It is in my opinion that those who we communicated with on an international level responded at their own leisure. They did not take the nature of the relationship seriously. Because they are professors I assume they handled business first and the questionnaire often came last of their long “to do” list.

Question: It was often difficult to reword the questions we were told to ask. I think instead of questions we should have been given discussion topics and let the communicator share freely what he or she chose to share. Also, at times the communicator was not knowledgeable about the questions therefore they could not answer it effectively. 

My Goal: I would love to work with Teaching Aboard. The international relationship allows me to make an educated decision on exactly where I would like to teach. Also it showed that the United States aren’t as advance as many Americans would like to believe.

Sharing Web Resource Week 6

NEA opposed the House leadership’s plan and supported the Senate-passed bill providing tax cuts for the middle class. In just six months, across the board funding cuts known as “sequestration” will go into effect unless Congress acts.

 The NEA website has a "Take Action" link. This link takes you to a website that allows you to enter your zip code. You then select your U.S House Representative. You can select pre-written talking points to add to your message. After selecting or typing you message you simply enter in your information and press send. Often we want to speak up but do not know what to say. This allows us to have a voice without the fear of using the wrong words.

PRE-WRITTEN MESSAGES:

As a constituent and an educator, I want to express my deep concern about the "sequestration" cuts scheduled to go into effect in January 2013, and about any deal Congress may reach to avoid sequestration.

Any deficit reduction deal must take a balanced approach between reducing spending and raising revenues.

Education and other programs serving, children, working families, seniors, and other vulnerable populations already took a huge hit in last year's Budget Control Act. These programs must not continue to be the source for deficit reduction while millionaires and corporations continue to benefit from tax cuts and loopholes.

Unless Congress acts to stop the sequester, education funding will fall off a cliff, dropping to pre-2003 levels. America's elementary, secondary, and postsecondary schools have added 5.4 million students since 2003, and costs associated with K-12 services have increased 25 percent since 2003.

The sequester cut would dramatically impact 9.35 million students by eliminating services, cutting financial aid and increasing class sizes.

As many as 80,500 jobs could be lost in early education, K-12 and postsecondary education. Since July 2008, the country has lost 312,700 public education jobs. This means there are roughly as many local school jobs today as in December 2004. Yet, there will be 847,000 more pre k-12 public school students this coming school year than in the fall of 2004.

We cannot balance the budget on the backs of children. Those most able to do so must pay their fair share toward deficit reduction.

Please make sure that any deficit reduction deal is balanced and equitable.